Section E — Comparative and strategic recommendations (15 points) 11. Compare tubdy mobile.com with two reputable alternatives in the same domain (10 points). For each alternative, provide strengths and weaknesses in a short table, and explain where tubdy mobile.com currently outperforms them and where it lags. 12. Deliver a prioritized action plan (5 points). Provide five concrete, ordered recommendations (technical, legal, UX, and business) the site should implement in the next 6 months, with a one-line rationale for each.
Section D — Content quality, legality, and ethics (20 points) 9. Critically evaluate content legitimacy and copyright considerations (10 points). Does the site host or link to third-party media? Discuss potential copyright infringement risks, fair use considerations, and red flags that suggest unauthorized distribution. 10. Discuss ethical implications for users (10 points). Consider exposure to malware, misleading ads, user tracking, and the impact on content creators. Propose mitigation steps site operators should take to be more ethical. tubdy mobile.com
Section C — Functionality, reliability, and technical assessment (25 points) 6. Assess the core functionality (10 points). Do features work reliably? Are there broken links, nonfunctional buttons, or download issues? Describe methods used to test (browser versions, devices). 7. Evaluate security and privacy practices visible from the site (8 points). Comment on HTTPS usage, presence of a privacy policy, cookie banners, and any requests for personal data. Highlight potential risks to users. 8. Provide a brief technical audit (7 points). Include server response observations (e.g., caching headers, gzip/brotli presence), common front-end technologies inferred (frameworks or libraries), and any SEO signals (titles, meta descriptions, structured data). Section E — Comparative and strategic recommendations (15