Also, check if there are any critical interpretations of Theodoros that I can reference. Maybe look for academic papers or reviews. But since I don't have external resources, I'll have to rely on my understanding of the novel and general literary analysis.
Cartarescu employs Theodoros to interrogate the malleability of identity. His interactions with the monk Ciprian and his visits to the ruins of a 14th-century monastery—linked to Empress Theodora and the monk Neprav—as blur the boundaries between past and present. Theodoros’s encounters with the manuscript, which recounts a medieval romance intertwined with historical figures (e.g., Empress Theodora), force him to confront the constructed nature of his own narrative. This fluidity mirrors the novel’s use of footnotes, shifts in font, and multiple timelines, suggesting that identity is a palimpsest of historical and symbolic layers. mircea cartarescu theodoros
Cartarescu embeds Blinding with intertextual references to Romanian medieval history, particularly the legend of Empress Theodora and the monk Neprav. Theodoros’s quest to visit the monastery where this love story unfolded becomes a metaphor for the search for cultural and personal roots. His confrontation with the manuscript’s creators—his predecessors in a cyclical narrative—highlights the inescapability of the past. The novel suggests that identity is shaped not in isolation but through dialogue with historical and literary traditions. Also, check if there are any critical interpretations